Seema Gupta v. Union Of India, Ministry Of Finance, Department Of Revenue, Through Its Secretary & ORS.

$~51.

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 9392/2019 SEEMA GUPTA ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr. Annirudh Bakhru, Mr. Shadman Ahmed Siddiqui and Mr. Anshuman Ray, Advocates.

versus UNION OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF FINANCE, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, THROUGH ITS SECRETARY & ORS.

..... Respondents Through:

Mr. Harpreet Singh, Sr. Standing Counsel with Ms. Suhani Mathur, Advocate for R-2 and R-3.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA

O R D E R

% 02.09.2019 C.M. No. 38699/2019 Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of.

W.P.(C) 9392/2019 and C.M. No. 38698/2019 After some arguments, on it being pointed out by learned counsel for the respondents, who appears on advance notice that M/s R.S.T. Batteries Pvt. Ltd. situated at Bahadurgarh (Jhajjar), Haryana, of which the petitioner is the Director, has been lying sealed since 2005 by the Haryana State

Pollution Control Board, which fact has not been disclosed in the writ petition and it has not been explained as to how the said company has been carrying on business and issuing invoices thereafter which led to the alleged fraudulent availment of Input Tax Credit to the tune of Rs. 22 crores, learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw the writ petition .

Dismissed as withdrawn.

VIPIN SANGHI, J SANJEEV NARULA, J SEPTEMBER 02, 2019 kd