Manju Mittal & ORS. v. State Of NCT Of Delih And ANR.

$~63 & 11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 1842/2024 MANJU MITTAL & ORS.

.....Petitioner Through:

Mr. Himanshu Jawa, Advocate.

versus STATE OF NCT OF DELIH AND ANR.

.....Respondent Through:

Mr. Anand V. Khatri, Add. Standing Counsel with SI Radha Kanwar.

11+ W.P.(CRL) 1689/2024 SHWETA AND ORS & ORS.

.....Petitioner Through:

Mr. Himanshu Jawa, Advocate.

versus STATE & ANR.

.....Respondent Through:

Mr. Anand V. Khatri, Add. Standing Counsel with SI Radha Kanwar.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANISH DAYAL

O R D E R

% 07.08.2024 CRL.M.A. 16439/2024 (Exemption) 1.

Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

2.

Application stands disposed of.

W.P.(CRL) 1842/2024 & W.P.(CRL) 1689/2024 1.

These petitions have been filed seeking quashing of FIR no. 1009/2024 and FIR no. 1010/2021 registered at PS Maurya Enclave, Delhi under Sections 323/341/506/509/34 of IPC on the basis of settlement arrived at between the parties dated 23rd February, 2024, which is on record of this Court.

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/08/2024 at 12:32:56

2.

This issue was arising out of a dispute between the landlord and the tenant and an altercation occurred, the FIR was registered in 2021 on this basis.

3.

ASC for the State states that charge sheet has since been filed in both the cases, therefore, costs be paid considering that process is already underway.

4.

Accordingly, Manju Mittal and Shweta will respectively deposit 7,500/- each in the Delhi High Court Legal Service Committee within the next two weeks.

5.

The proof of the deposit shall be placed on an affidavit within two weeks thereafter. Subject to the cost being paid, the FIR stands quashed. 6.

Considering the above settlement between the parties and the chances of conviction of the petitioners being remote and bleak, there is no use continuing with proceedings of the present FIR as it would be a misuse of the process of the Court and an unnecessary burden on the State exchequer. Accordingly, the petition is allowed. Consequently, the FIR No. 1009/2024 and FIR no. 1010/2021under Sections 323/341/506/509/34 of IPC registered at PS Maurya Enclave, Delhi and proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed.

7.

Parties shall abide by the terms of settlement. 8.

Accordingly, the petition is disposed of. Pending applications (if any) are disposed of as infructuous.

9.

Order be uploaded on the website of this Court. ANISH DAYAL, J AUGUST 7, 2024/RK The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/08/2024 at 12:32:56