R.T.Nayak v. Central Bureau Of Investigation & ANR

$~18& 19 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ CRL.M.C. 3894/2008, CRL MA 12510/2010 NANDITA BAKSHI & ANR.

Petitioners Represented by:

None versus Represented by:

Respondents Mr. Narender Mann, SPP for CBI with Mr. Manoj Pant, Advocate Mr. Atul Kumar, Advocate for RespondentNo.2/CanaraBank C.B.I. & ANR.

CRL.M.C. 1065/2014 , CRL MA 3597/2014 R.T.NAYAK Represented by:

+ Petitioner versus CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION & ANR Respondents Represented by:

Mr. Narender Mann, SPP for CBI with Mr. Manoj Pant, Advocate Mr. Atul Kumar, Advocate for Respondent No.2/Canara Bank

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA

ORDER

17.03.2017 % On the last date learned proxy counsel who was present on behalf of the petitioners, stated that she had instructions to withdraw the petition, however, the counsel whose vakalatnama is on record was not available.

By:AMULYA

Today none is presenton behalfof the petitioners. LearnedSpecial Public Prosecutor for CBI informs that all the petitionersin these two petitionshave been convictedvide orderdated March, 2017 by Sh. PK Jain Sp. Judge,RohiniCourts.

Consequently, these petitions seeking quashing of FIR and proceedings pursuant thereto and the applications are dismissed as inffuctuous.

MUKTA GUPTA, J.

MARCH 17, 2017 'sm'