Guddu @ Pandu v. State

$~60 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 421/2016 GUDDU @ PANDU ..... Petitioner Through:

Ms.Naomi Chandra, Advocate versus STATE ..... Respondent Through:

Mr. Rajesh Mahajan, A.S.C. for the State

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI

O R D E R

% 09.02.2016 1.

By way of this writ petition filed under Article 226 & 227 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of Cr.P.C., petitioner is seeking furlough for a period of three weeks.

2.

Notice. Mr. Rajesh Mahajan, A.S.C. for the State accepts notice of this writ petition.

3.

Nominal roll of the petitioner has also been placed on record as per which the Petitioner has been released on one month parole w.e.f. 23rd September, 2015 to 23rd October, 2015 by this Court. 4.

As per Parole/Furlough Guidelines-2010, a minimum period of six months ought to have elapsed from the date of termination of the previous parole/furlough.

5.

In the given facts and circumstances, the prayer of the Petitioner for releasing him on parole is hereby rejected.

6.

Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed.

7.

Petitioner be informed through concerned Jail Superintendent about the orders passed.

PRATIBHA RANI, J.

FEBRUARY 09, 2016/'pg'