Monu @ Bahadur v. State

$~61 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 422/2016 MONU @ BAHADUR ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr.Ajit Sharma, Advocate versus STATE ..... Respondent Through:

Mr.Ashish Aggarwal, A.S.C. for the State with Mr.Piyush Singhal, Adv.

with SI Sanjay PS Ambedkar Nagar

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI

O R D E R

% 09.02.2016 1.

By way of this writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of Cr.P.C., petitioner is seeking parole for a period of three months on the ground of completing the unfinished structure of his house, getting appropriate treatment from the private hospital for the ailment of piles and reconnecting social ties with the family & society. 2.

A perusal of the nominal roll reveals that overall jail conduct of the Petitioner has been unsatisfactory and punishments dated 27th November, 2015, 11th July, 2015, 29th May, 2013 & 19th August, 2008 have been awarded to him.

3.

As per clause 11.2 of Parole/Furlough Guidelines-2010, in order to be eligible for release on parole, the conduct of the convict in prison must have been uniformly good.

4.

In view of the above, no ground for releasing the Petitioner on parole is made out at this stage. This writ petition is, therefore, dismissed. PRATIBHA RANI, J.

FEBRUARY 09, 2016/'pg'