← Library
High Court of DelhiLPA/369/2025

Greater Kailash-Ii Welfare Association v. Mahendra Kumr Sehgal & ORS.

2026-01-21Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Tejas Karia3 pages

$~40 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ LPA 369/2025 GREATER KAILASH-II WELFARE ASSOCIATION .....Appellant Through:

Mr. Udian Sharma, Mr. Manav Mitra, Mr. Sahil Saraswat and Mr. Harsha Sadhwani, Advocates.

versus MAHENDRA KUMR SEHGAL & ORS.

.....Respondents Through:

Mr. Aman Goyal and Mr. Ritik Raj, Advocates.

CORAM:

HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TEJAS KARIA

O R D E R

% 27.03.2026 CM APPL. 19156/2026 1.

Heard the learned Counsel for the Parties.

2.

This Application has been filed on behalf of the Appellant under Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 seeking certain modification in the order dated 21.01.2026, by which the Appeal was finally disposed of with a request to the learned Single Judge to expedite the hearing of W.P.(C) No. 4871/2025 and decide the same as expeditiously as possible. The Court further observed in the said order dated 21.01.2026 that the interim order dated 29.05.2025 passed in the Appeal shall continue to operate till the disposal of the W.P.(C) No. 4871/2025. 3.

It has been stated by the learned Counsel for the Appellant that as a matter of fact, the order disposing of the Appeal on 21.01.2026 was passed The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

not on the prayer made by the Appellant but on the prayer made by Respondent No. 3 in CM APPL No. 4001/2026 and, accordingly, the said fact may correctly be recorded in the order dated 21.01.2026. 4.

The learned Counsel for the Respondents does not have any objection to the statement made by the learned Counsel for the Appellant. 5.

Accordingly, we modify the order dated 21.01.2026, which shall now be read as under:

"1.

We have heard the learned Counsel for the Appellant as also the learned Counsel representing Respondent No. 3. 2.

It has been stated by the learned Counsel representing Respondent No. 3 that this Appeal may be disposed of finally with a request to the learned Single Judge to expedite the proceedings of W.P.(C) No.4871/2025.

3.

The learned Counsel for the Appellant does not have any objection if the Appeal is disposed of in terms of the request made by the learned Counsel representing Respondent No. 3, however, he states that the interim order dated 29.05.2025 passed by this Court in the Appeal shall be ordered to continue to operate till the disposal of W.P.(C) No.4871/2025 4.

In view of the aforesaid, we dispose of this Appeal with a request to the learned Single Judge to expedite the hearing of W.P.(C) No.4871/2025 and decide the same as expeditiously as possible.

5.

We may observe that we have not entered into the merits of the claims of the respective Parties. We keep all the issues open to be argued by the Parties before the learned Single Judge.

6.

We also provide that the interim order dated 29.05.2025 shall continue to operate till the disposal of W.P.(C) No.4871/2025.

7.

The date earlier given of 26.02.2026 stands cancelled. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

8.

The Appeal as well as the pending Application stand disposed of."

6.

In the aforesaid terms, the present Application stands disposed of. DEVENDRA KUMAR UPADHYAYA, CJ TEJAS KARIA, J MARCH 27, 2026 ap The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.