Anand Tiwari v. State & ORS.

$~7 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 503/2017 ANAND TIWARI ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr. H.N. Pandey, Advocate.

versus STATE & ORS.

..... Respondents Through:

Mr. Amit Ahlawat, APP for State with SI Yogendra Kumar, PS EOW.

Ms. Pallavi Nirmal, Advocate with AR of the complainant/respondent No.2 in person.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL

O R D E R

% 13.07.2017 The instant petition has been filed by the petitioners seeking quashing of FIR No.20/2014 registered under Sections 103/104 Trade Mark Act and 63 Copy Right Act at PS Economic offence wing, Delhi, on the complaint of respondent No.2 and the proceedings pursuant thereto on the ground that a compromise/settlement has been arrived at between the parties in the matter. AR of the complainant/respondent No. 2 is present in Court today and is identified by learned counsel and the Investigating Officer. He states that he has settled the matter with the petitioner with his own free will and choice without any threat, pressure and coercion and does not wish to pursue the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto. Statements of the parties have been recorded separately. CRL.M.C. 503/2017

In view of the fact that the parties have amicably resolved their differences voluntarily and out of their own free will and without any coercion, pressure, and no useful purpose will be served in continuance of the proceedings. It would be in the interest of justice to quash the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto. There is no legal impediment in quashing the FIR in question. Consequently, FIR No.20/2014 registered under Sections 103/104 Trade Mark Act and 63 Copy Right Act at PS Economic offence wing, Delhi and proceedings pursuant thereto are hereby quashed.

The petition is disposed of.

SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL, J JULY 13, 2017 afa CRL.M.C. 503/2017