Arvind Kumar v. State And ANR.
$~63 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 6551/2023 ARVIND KUMAR & ANR.
..... Petitioners Through: Mr.Sanjeev Kr. Baliyan, Advocate versus STATE AND ANR.
..... Respondents Through: Mr. Nawal Kishore Jha, APP for State with SI Jay Prakash Ms.Sunita Arora, Advocate for respondent No.2 with respondent No.2 in person
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI
O R D E R
% 01.03.2024 CRL.M.A. 6743/2024 (exemption) 1.
Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
2.
The application is disposed of.
CRL.M.A. 6742/2024 (to bring on record amended memo of parties) 1.
By way of present application filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C., the petitioner seeks permission to bring on record the amended memo of parties. 2.
Issue notice. Learned APP for the State and learned counsel for respondent No.2 accept notice.
3.
For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed and the amended memo of parties is taken on record.
4.
The application is disposed of.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.
CRL.M.C. 6551/2023 1.
The present petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of FIR No.150/2013 registered under Sections 498A/406/506/307/323/34 IPC at P.S. Inderpuri, Delhi on the ground that the parties have amicably settled their disputes. 2.
The present FIR is an outcome of a matrimonial dispute between the complainant/respondent No. 2 (wife) and the petitioner No.1 (husband) whereas petitioner No.2 is the mother-in-law of the complainant/respondent No.2.
3.
Learned APP for the State submits that the present petitioners are the only accused persons and respondent No.2 is the complainant/victim. 4.
Learned counsels for the parties submit that the parties have entered into an out of court settlement and that they have been living together since the last four years.
5.
The petitioners and respondent No.2, who are present in the Court, have been identified by their respective counsels and the Investigating Officer.
6.
Respondent No.2 states that she has no complaint against the petitioners and further states that she has entered into the aforesaid settlement with her own free will, volition and without any coercion. She further states that she has no objection if the present FIR and consequent proceedings are quashed.
7.
Learned counsels for the parties submit that no other proceedings are pending between the parties.
8.
The parties shall remain bound by the statements made in Court today.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.
9.
In view of the above facts and since no useful purpose will be served in continuance of the present criminal proceedings, it is directed that the aforesaid FIR and the consequent proceedings arising therefrom are hereby quashed.
10.
The petition is disposed of in the above terms. MANOJ KUMAR OHRI, J MARCH 1, 2024 na The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.