← Library
High Court of DelhiCS(COMM)/74/2024

E R Squibb And Sons Llc & ORS. v. Beacon Pharmaceuticals Limited & ORS.

2025-12-22Hon'Ble Ms. Justice Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora3 pages

$~50 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + E R SQUIBB AND SONS LLC & ORS.

.....Plaintiffs Through:

Mr. Pravin Anand, Ms. Elisha Sinha and Mr. Manan Mondal, Advs.

versus BEACON PHARMACEUTICALS LIMITED & ORS. .....Defendant Through:

Mr. Anshu Deshpande, Advocate for D-1 and D-2 with Mr. Sourav Roy, Adv. (Through VC)

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA

O R D E R

% 22.12.2025 1.

This is a suit for a permanent injunction restraining infringement of Indian Patent No. 340060, damages, rendition of accounts, and other ancillary reliefs.

2.

This order is being passed in continuation of the order dated 11.12.2025.

3.

Mr. Anshu Deshpande, Advocate, states on instructions from defendant nos. 1 and 2 that the said defendants are agreeable to the suggestions of the plaintiffs as recorded in the order dated 11.12.2025. 3.1.

He states that a decree for permanent injunction may be passed in favour of the plaintiffs and against defendant nos. 1 and 2 in terms of paragraph '84(a)' of the plaint, subject to the said plaintiffs giving up their remaining reliefs for damages, delivery up and costs. 4.

Learned counsel for the plaintiffs' states that the plaintiffs are The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

agreeable to the aforesaid suggestion of defendant nos. 1 and 2 and have also no objection to the deletion of defendant no. 3 in view of the decree being passed against defendant nos. 1 and 2.

5.

In view of the aforesaid, no contest by defendant nos. 1 and 2, the suit for relief of permanent injunction as prayed for at paragraph '84(a)' of the plaint is hereby decreed in favour of the plaintiff and against the defendant nos. 1 and 2.

6.

Defendant nos. 1 and 2 are directed to file an affidavit in terms of their statement recorded today within a period of two [2] weeks. 7.

Accordingly, Defendant no. 3 is deleted from the array of parties. 8.

Amended memo of parties shall be filed by the plaintiffs within ten [10] days.

9.

The remaining prayers of the suit are disposed of as not pressed. 10.

The registry is directed to draw up a decree in terms thereof. Refund of Court Fees 11.

Learned counsel for the plaintiffs has also requested a partial refund of Court Fees in view of the early disposal of the suit and amicable resolution.

12.

Keeping in view the aforesaid facts, the registry is directed to refund 50% Court Fee in favour of the plaintiffs within four [4] weeks, in accordance with law. The said direction has been passed having regard to Sections 16 and 16A of the Court Fees Act, 1870. 13.

Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of. 14.

All future dates stand cancelled.

15.

website of the Delhi High Court, www.delhihighcourt.nic.in, shall be treated The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

as a certified copy of the order for the purpose of ensuring compliance. No physical copy of order shall be insisted by any authority/entity or litigant. MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA, J DECEMBER 22, 2025/hp/aa The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.