Dinesh @ Dinesh Kumar v. The State (NCT Of Delhi) & ANR.

$~66 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 4022/2025 DINESH @ DINESH KUMAR .....Petitioner Through:

Mr. Vikas Rohtagi, Mr. Kumar Gaurav and Mr.

Neeraj Singh, Advocates along with petitioner-inperson.

versus THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR.

.....Respondents Through:

Mr. Rajkumar, APP for the State.

Mr. Pankaj Rohilla, Advocate for R-2 along with R-2.

CORAM:

HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMA

O R D E R

% 30.05.2025 CRL.M.A. 17497/2025 (exemption) 1.

Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

2.

Application stands disposed of.

CRL.M.C. 4022/2025 3.

By way of the present petition, the petitioner seeks quashing of the FIR bearing No. 897/2021, registered at Police Station Bawana, District North, Delhi, for the commission of offences punishable under Sections 323/341 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereafter 'IPC'). 4.

Issue notice. Mr. Rajkumar, the learned APP accepts notice on behalf The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

of the State.

5.

The petitioner and respondent no. 2 are present before this Court and have been identified by their counsel and Investigating Officer (IO) concerned.

6.

Brief facts of the case are that on 02.11.2021, a quarrel had taken place between the petitioner and respondent no.2, wherein the respondent no. 2 got injured and had been taken to a hospital. Upon the complaint being filed by respondent no. 2, the present FIR came to be registered against the petitioner. After investigation, chargesheet was filed before the concerned Court. It is stated that with the intervention of family and friends, the parties have now amicably settled their disputes vide Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) dated 14.05.2025.

7.

On a query made by this Court, respondent no. 2 who has been identified by the IO concerned, has categorically stated that he has entered into a compromise out of his own free will and without any pressure, coercion or threat. Therefore, she has no objection if the present FIR is quashed.

8.

In view of the above, that the parties have amicably resolved their differences of their own free will, and without any coercion, and no useful purpose will be served by continuing the proceedings, rather the same would create further acrimony between them. It would thus be in interest of justice to quash the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto. There is no legal impediment in quashing the FIR in question. 9.

Accordingly, FIR bearing No. 897/2021, registered at Police Station Bawana, District North, Delhi, for the commission of offences punishable under Sections 323/341 of IPC and all consequential proceedings emanating The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

therefrom are quashed.

10.

In view of above, the present petition stands disposed of. 11.

The order be uploaded on the website forthwith. DR. SWARANA KANTA SHARMA, J MAY 30, 2025/zp Click here to check corrigendum, if any The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.