Rupesh Kumar Singh v. The State (Govt. Of NCT Of Delhi)

Signed By:RAM DATT Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing.

$-38 & *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ BAIL APPLN.

2237/2019 RUPESH KUMAR SINGH Petitioner Through:

Dr Ranjit Singh, Advocate.

versus THE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) Respondent Through: Ms Meenakshi Chauhan, APP for State with SI Madan Mohan, Cyber Crime Cell, New Delhi.

AND BAIL APPLN.

2238/2019 RUPESH KUMAR SINGH Petitioner Through: Dr Ranjit Singh, Advocate.

/ versus THE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) Respondent Through: Ms Meenakshi Chauhan, APP for State with SI Madan Mohan, Cyber Crime Cell, New Delhi.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR.

JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU

ORDER

% 06.09.2019 CRL.M.A. 35339/2019 in BAIL APPLN.

2237/2019 CRL.M.A. 35340/2019 in BAIL APPLN.

2238/2019 1.

Allowed, subj ect to all j ust exceptions.

BAIL APPLN.

2237/2019 BAIL APPLN.

2238/2019 2.

The petitioner has filed the present petitions, inter alia, praying that directions be issued for release of the petitioner on bail in the event of his arrest in connection with FIR No. 0142/2018 under Section 420/34 IPC and FIR No. 0035/2018 under Section 420/120-B/406 IPC. 3.

The learned APP appearing for the State states that the petitioner has not joined the investigation and Non-bailable Warrants have been issued against the petitioner. She also states that proceedings declaring the petitioner as proclaimed offender have been initiated and the matter is listed before the trial court on 11.09.2019.

4.

The petitioner states that he is suffering from cancer and his medical condition is precarious. He has also annexed certain medication prescriptions alongwith the instant applications, which are not readily } discermble. However, it does appear that the petitioner has been undergoing medication at various hospitals.

5.

In view of the above, this Court considers it apposite to direct the petitioner to appear before the trial court on 11.09.2019 in the proceedings initiated by the State and join the investigation. The trial court shall consider whether the petitioner ought to be released on bail or ought to be taken in custody.

6.

Needless to state that the trial court shall take into account all mitigating circumstances, as canvassed by the petitioner. 7.

In the meanwhile (till 11.09.2019), the petitioner shall not be arrested.

8.

The petitions are disposed of with the aforesaid observations. 9.

Order dasti under signatures of the Court Master. VTOHUBAKHRU,!

SEPTEMBER 06,2019 MK