Rajiv Sharma v. New Delhi Municipal Council Through Its Vice Chairman & ORS

$~53 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(C) 9784/2019 RAJIV SHARMA ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr. Umesh Sharama, Advocate

Versus

NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL THROUGH ITS VICE CHAIRMAN & ORS.

..... Respondents Through:

Mr.Anil Grover, Standing Counsel for respondents No.1 & 3-New Delhi Municipal Council with Mr.Gaurav Bhargava, Advocate

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA

O R D E R

% 11.09.2019 CM APPL. 40396/2019 (exemption) Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions. W.P.(C) 9784/2019 1.

Petitioner by the present petition seeks a direction against the respondents for disclosing the taking of appropriate action against officers of the respondents for not returning the earnest money deposited / furnished by the petitioner within time and promptly after the tender was cancelled.

2.

Learned counsel for petitioner submits that a complaint has Page | 1

also been lodged with the Vigilance Department and the same is pending inquiry with the Department. Learned counsel for petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the petition stating that since the vigilance inquiry is already pending, he shall await the result of the vigilance inquiry.

3.

In view of the above, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn. It is clarified that nothing stated herein shall influence the vigilance inquiry, which shall be disposed of in accordance with law. SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J SEPTEMBER 11, 2019 r Page | 2