Arun Kumar Nayyar v. Hazari Lal Garg

LI $-31 & 32 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ RC.REV.55/2015 ARUN KUMAR NAYYAR Petitioner Thrqugh: appearance not given.

versus RAJTNI BAHL . ......

Respondent Through:

Mr. Arvind Nayar and Mr. Sanad K Jha, Advs.

+ RC.REV.56/2015 ARUN KUMAR NAYYAR ......Petitioner Through:

appearance not given.

versus HAZARJ LAL GARG .....Respondent Through:

Mr. Amit S Chadha, Adv with Mr.

Deep Dhamija, Adv.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. SHALl

ORDER

% 24.09.2015 After brief submissions the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the petitions and states that he is not assailing the impugned order passed by the learned ARC granting leave to defend to the respondent. However, he prays that a direction may be given to the learned ARC to expedite the matter as expeditiously as possible. In view of the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, both the petitions are dismissed as not pressed. It is needless to say that the learned ARC shall make every endeavour to decide the petition as expeditiously as possible keeping in view of the total pendency of the cases.

V.K. SHALl, J.

SEPTEMI , R 24, 2015 ac Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared the digital data is as per the physical file