Rahul Public School v. Central Board Of Secondary Education

$~43 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 8139/2025 RAHUL PUBLIC SCHOOL .....Petitioner Through:

Mr. Kirtiman Singh, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Y. Shukla, Mr. Taha Yasin, Mr.

Naman Shukla and Ms. Isha, Advs.

versus CENTRAL BOARD OF SECONDARY EDUCATION...Respondent Through:

Ms. Manisha Singh, Adv. for CBSE.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS MAHAJAN

O R D E R

% 30.05.2025 CM APPL. No. 35518/2025 (exemption) 1.

Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

2.

Application stands disposed of.

W.P.(C) 8139/2025 and CM APPL. No. 35519/2025 (by the petitioner under Section 151 CPC seeking interim relief) 3.

The present petition has been filed on behalf of the petitioner seeking following reliefs:

"i.

Issue a writ or direction in the nature of Certiorari and/or any other appropriate Writ, order or direction in the nature thereof to set aside the Show Cause Notice dated 13.09.2024 passed by the Respondent; and/or ii.

Issue a writ or direction in the nature of Certiorari and/or any other appropriate Writ, order or direction in the nature thereof setting aside the Order dated 23.04.2025 and 29.10.2024 passed by the Respondent The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

dis-affiliating the Petitioner school; and/or iii.

Issue a writ or direction in the nature of Certiorari and/or any other appropriate Writ, order or direction in the nature thereof setting aside the Order dated 17.02.2025 and 19.02.2025 passed by the Respondent transferring the students of the Petitioner school." 4.

At the outset, Mr. Kirtiman Singh, learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the petitioner will not press the present petition any further if the respondent/CBSE treats the present petition as a representation and dispose of the same by a speaking order after affording personal hearing to the petitioner. 5.

In view of the above, issue notice.

6.

Ms. Manisha Singh, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent/CBSE accepts notice.

7.

Having regard to the limited relief articulated by Mr. Kirtiman Singh, this Court deems it appropriate to dispose of the present petition with a direction to the respondent/CBSE to treat the same as representation and dispose of the same by way of a speaking order within a period of 10 days from today, after affording personal hearing to the petitioner. Ordered accordingly.

8.

It is made clear that petitioner school will not take any new admissions for Class-IX to Class-XII till the disposal of its representation. 9.

It is further clarified that nothing has been expressed on the merits of the case nor the present order will create any special equities in favour of the present petitioner.

10.

Respondent/CBSE will be at liberty to seek any further documents from the petitioner school, if deemed necessary, for deciding the aforesaid The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

representation.

11.

The petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms. Consequently, the pending application also stands disposed of.

12.

A copy of this order be given dasti under signature of Court Master. VIKAS MAHAJAN, J MAY 30, 2025 aj The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.