Meena Srivastava v. Union Of India

$-14 to 17 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W/.(C) 9864/2019 & CM No. 40808/2019

(15) vW.P.(C) 9865/2019 & CM No. 40810/2019

(16) W.P.(C) 9866/2019 & CM No. 40812/2019

(17) W.P.(C) 9867/2019 & CM No. 40814/2019 ALOK SHUKLA Petitioner RAJINDER TYAGI Petitioner JARDINEINFRASTRCTURE DEVELOPERS (P) LTD.

Petitioner MEENA SRIVASTAVA Petitioner Through:

Ms.SunitaBhardwaj, Adv.

versus UNION OF INDIA Respondent Through:

Mr.Anil Dabas and Mi*.Parveen Kumar, Advs.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR.

JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA

ORDER

% 20.11.2019 The learned counsel for the respondent hands over a copy of the Circular dated 16.09.2016 containing the decision of the Government to execute the Deed of Apartment in respect to the flats/apartments of the Multistoried Group Housing situated on the land of the Government of India and constructed with the approval of the Land and Development Office. The learned counsel for the petitioner(s) submits that the petitioner(s) shall apply for the execution of the Deed of Apartment in the prescribed performa annexed with this Circular as also shall comply with the condition Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing.

mentioned therein.

In view of the above, the present petition(s) are disposed off directing the respondent to consider the application(s) so made by the petitioner(s) and communicate a decision thereon to the petitioner(s) within a period of five months of receipt of such application(s). Needless to say that if the petitioner(s) are aggrieved with the decision of the respondent on the said application(s), it will be always open to the petitioner(s) to challenge the same in accordance with the law. Dasti.

NAVIN CHAWLA, J NOVEMBER 20, 2Q19/Arya