Raj Kumar v. State (NCT Of Delhi)

$~47 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(CRL) 2699/2023 RAJ KUMAR .....Petitioner Through:

Mr. Siddharth Yadav, Advocate.

versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) .....Respondent Through:

Mr. Yasir Rauf Ansari, ASC with Mr.

Alok Sharma, Mr. Vasu Agarwal, Mr.

Prshant Kumar Singh and Mr. Suresh Kumar Singh, Advocates for the State with SI Raghubir Prasad, PS Khyala.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA

O R D E R

% 29.07.2024 CRL.M.A.21945/2024(Exemption) 1.

Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. 2.

The application stands disposed of.

CRL.M.A. 21944/2024 (seeking restoration of the Petition) 3.

The application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. has been filed on behalf of the petitioner seeking restoration of the present Writ Petition on the ground that the furlough has not been decided till date. However, learned APP for the State has informed that the furlough has been allowed vide Order dated 26.07.2024.

4.

The application is disposed of as infructuous. NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J JULY 29, 2024/RS The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 04/07/2025 at 03:18:36