Neetan Chandil v. Union Of India & ORS

0- $-1, 31 and 33 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(C) 12131/2019 KARNAIL SINGH .....Petitioner Through:

Mr.Abhishek Kumar, Choudhary with Mr.Brijesh Kumar, Choudhary, Advocates.

versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

Respondents Through:

Mr.Akshay Makhija, CGSC with Mr.Amit Kumar Dogra, Advocate for R-ltoR-3.

WITH + W.P.(C) 9874/2019 NEETAN CHANDIL Petitioner Through:

Mr.Abhishek Kumar, Choudhary with Mr.Brijesh Kumar, Choudhary, Advocates.

versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS • - Respondents Through:

Mr. Siddhartha Khatana, Senior Panel Counsel with Mr.Anshuman, Advocate for R-1 to R-4.

AND + W.P.(C) 11564/2019 SATISH KUMAR Petitioner Through:

Mr.Abhishek Kumar, Choudhary with Mr.Brijesh Kumar, Choudhary, Advocates.

versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

Respondents Through:

Mr.Sahaj Garg, Advocate.

Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing.

CORAM:

JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH

ORDER

% 26.11.2019

1. The present petitions have been filed seeking a direction to the Respondents to offer the Petitioners appointment letters to the posts of 'Safaiwala' and 'Washerman', which the Petitioners are stated to have successfully undergone a selection process for.

2. The Petitioners are identically placed as the Petitioner in W.P.(C) No. 11507/2017 (Ravinder Sirohi v. Union of India). The said writ petition was allowed by this Court by its judgment dated H"' February, 2019, a copy of which has been annexed as Annexure 'A-5' to W.P.(C) No.9874/2019.

3. Accordingly, the same relief is granted to the present Petitioners. The Respondents are directed to appoint the Petitioners to the respective posts that they applied and underwent selection for, and issue appropriate, orders , j in that regard, within a period of eight weeks.

4. The petitions are disposed of in the above terms S. M^^bHlHAR, J.

TALWANT SINGfl, J.

NOVEMBER 26, 2019 mr