Ranjeet & ANR. v. State (Govt. Of NCT Of Delhi) & ANR.
$~65 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 6860/2023 RANJEET & ORS.
..... Petitioners Through: Mr.Rajan Kr. Prasad, Advocate with petitioners in person versus STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR.
..... Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, APP for State with SI Amit Kumar Respondent No.2 in person
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI
O R D E R
% 05.03.2024 1.
The present petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of FIR No. 268/2023 registered under Sections 324/354B/506/34 IPC at P.S. Badarpur, Delhi on the ground that the parties have amicably settled their disputes.
2.
As per the allegations levelled in the FIR, the petitioners hurled abuses and gave beatings to the complainant as a result of which she sustained injuries.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that amended memo of parties impleading Guddi, Priyanka, Rahul and Ritesh has been filed. A copy of the same has been handed over and the same is taken on record. 4.
Learned APP for the State submits that in the present case the petitioners are the only accused persons and respondent No.2 is the complainant/victim.
5.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that, with the intervention The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 11/03/2024 at 11:22:43
of friends, relative and local people of society, the parties have entered into a settlement vide Memorandum of Understanding dated 11.08.2023 and in terms of the settlement, respondent No.2 has received Rs.15,000/- in cash and is now left with no claim whatsoever against the present petitioners. 6.
The petitioners, who are present in the Court, have been identified by their counsel as well as by the Investigating Officer. Respondent No.2, who is also present in the Court, has also been identified by the Investigating Officer.
7.
The petitioners have shown remorse for their conducts and they undertake not to repeat the same in future. Respondent No.2 states that she has entered into the aforesaid Memorandum of Understanding out of her own free will, volition and without any coercion. She further states that she has no objection if the present FIR and consequent proceedings are quashed. 8.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that no other proceedings are pending between the parties.
9.
The parties shall remain bound by the statements made in Court today.
10.
In view of the above facts and since no useful purpose will be served in continuance of the present criminal proceedings, it is directed that the aforesaid FIR and the consequent proceedings arising therefrom are hereby quashed.
11.
With the above directions, the petition is disposed of. MANOJ KUMAR OHRI, J MARCH 5, 2024/na The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 11/03/2024 at 11:22:43