Purshottam Kumar v. Krishna

$~25 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ C.R.P. 167/2022 & CM APPL. 43502/2022 PURSHOTTAM KUMAR .....Petitioner Through:

Mr. Ajay Malviya and Ms. Usha, Advocates along with Petitioner in person.

versus KRISHNA .....Respondent Through:

Mr. Bhupesh Saini, Advocate.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA

O R D E R

% 28.11.2024 1.

The Revision Petition under Section 115 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908 has been filed against the judgment dated 02.09.2022 in CS No.613240/2016 whereby the application under Order 9 Rule 13 CPC filed by the Revisionist has been allowed but in addition directions have been given to the Revisionist to deposit Rs.14 lakhs in the Court.

2.

Learned counsel along with the Revisionist submits that the receipt of Rs.14 lakhs is disputed. Moreover, the Revisionist is not in a position to deposit the entire amount and would result in unwarranted hardship which may unable him even in contesting the suit on merits.

3.

Submissions Heard.

4.

Considering the totality of facts and circumstances, the deposit amount is reduced to Rs.7 lakhs to be deposited within four weeks in The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 13:59:27

the Court.

5.

Revision Petition is accordingly disposed of. 6.

Considering that it is an old case, the learned Trial Court shall make an endeavour to expedite the matter.

NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J NOVEMBER 28, 2024 rk The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 13:59:27