Kanishka & ANR v. The State (N.C.T) Delhi & ORS

$~73 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(CRL) 2630/2019 KANISHKA & ANR ..... Petitioners Through:

None.

versus THE STATE (N.C.T) DELHI & ORS ..... Respondents Through:

Mr Rajesh Mahajan, ASC with Ms Shrutika Vedi and Ms Jyoti Babbar, Advocates for State with ASI Bal Kishan, PS New Ashok Nagar.

Mr Tarun Kumar Makhija, Advocate for R-4.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU

O R D E R

% 26.02.2020 1.

None appears for the petitioner.

2.

The petitioners have filed the present petition, inter alia, praying that directions be issued to the concerned authorities to take action against respondent nos.3 to 11 and to provide security to the petitioners. It is averred that the petitioners have married contrary to the wishes of the family members of petitioner no.1 (respondent nos.3 to 11) and they apprehend harm at the hands of the said respondents.

3.

Respondent no.4 - who is the father of petitioner no.1 - is present in Court and he states that he has reconciled to the marriage of the petitioners and has no grievance against them.

4.

Mr Mahajan, learned ASC appearing for the State submits that the

petitioners are no longer residing within the jurisdiction of this Court and have shifted to Hyderabad.

5.

In view of the above, no further orders are required to be passed in this petition. The same is disposed of.

VIBHU BAKHRU, J FEBRUARY 26, 2020 MK