Anil v. State

$~38 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(CRL) 486/2017 ANIL ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr. Nitish Chaudhary, Adv.

versus STATE ..... Respondent Through:

Mr.

Sanjay Lao, ASC with Mr.

Siddarth Sindhu, Adv. along with SI Ravi Kumar, P.S. Domestic Airport.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK

O R D E R

% 15.02.2017 Notice. Learned Additional Standing Counsel for the State accepts notice.

Status report has been filed which is taken on record. Petitioner seeks parole for a period of three months on the ground of maintaining social ties. It is noted that petitioner was granted furlough in the month of October, 2016 and surrendered in the mid of November, 2016, thus, ground of maintaining social ties is not convincing. Petition is dismissed. A.K. PATHAK, J.

FEBRUARY 15, 2017 ga