Sandeep Singh And ORS v. The State NCT Of Delhi Through Sho P S Alipur & ANR.

$~18 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 5030/2024 SANDEEP SINGH AND ORS .....Petitioners Through: Mr.Ashish Sehrawat, Mr.Kapil and Mr.Nikhil, Advocates with petitioners in person versus THE STATE NCT OF DELHI THROUGH SHO P S ALIPUR & ANR.

.....Respondents Through: Mr.Laksh Khanna, APP for State with SI Priyanka Mr.Prashant Sharma, Mr.Chanchal Bhardwaj and Mr.Ravi Kumar, Advocates for respondent No.2 with respondent No.2 in person

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI

O R D E R

% 04.07.2024 CRL.M.A. 19224/2024 (exemption) 1.

Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

2.

The application is disposed of.

CRL.M.C. 5030/2024 and CRL.M.A. 19223/2024 (stay) 1.

The present petition has been filed seeking quashing of FIR No.450/2018 registered under Sections 323/341/354B/506/34 IPC at P.S. Alipur, New Delhi on the ground that the parties have amicably settled their disputes.

2.

As per the allegations levelled in the FIR, the petitioners made inappropriate gestures and comments towards the complainant and even The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

gave fist and kick blows as a result of which injuries were sustained by the complainant.

3.

Learned APP for the State submits that in the present case the petitioners are the only accused persons and respondent No.2 is the complainant/victim.

4.

Learned counsels for the parties submit that the parties have entered into a settlement vide Memorandum of Understanding dated 24.06.2024 and in terms of the settlement, respondent No.2 is now left with no claim or grievance whatsoever against the petitioners. 5.

The petitioners and respondent No.2, who are present in the Court, have been identified by their respective counsels as well as by the Investigating Officer.

6.

The petitioners have shown remorse for their conduct and they undertake not to repeat the same in future. Respondent No.2 states that she has entered into the aforesaid Memorandum of Understanding out of her own free will, volition and without any coercion. She further states that she has no objection if the present FIR and consequent proceedings are quashed. 7.

Learned counsels for the parties submit that no other proceedings are pending between the parties.

8.

The parties shall remain bound by the statements made in Court today.

9.

In view of the above facts and since no useful purpose will be served in continuance of the present criminal proceedings, it is directed that the aforesaid FIR and the consequent proceedings arising therefrom are hereby quashed, subject to payment of cost of Rs.5,000/- by each petitioner to be paid to the complainant/victim/respondent No.2 by way of demand draft The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

through I.O. within a period of one week from today. 10.

In case the cost is not paid within the stipulated time, the I.O. shall be at liberty to move an appropriate application. 11.

With the above directions, the petition is disposed of alongwith the pending application.

DASTI.

MANOJ KUMAR OHRI, J JULY 4, 2024 na The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.