Narender Khanna v. Govt Of NCT Of Delhi & ORS.
$~23 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 8494/2025 NARENDER KHANNA .....Petitioner Through:
Mr. Saurabh Sharma, Mr. Manoj Gupta and Mr. Mayank Barua, Advs.
versus GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS.
.....Respondents Through:
Mr. Abhinav Singh and Ms. Bharti Yadav, Advs. for R-1 Mr. Manish Kumar Srivastava, Mr.
Moksh Arora and Mr. Santosh Ramdurg, Advs. with Mr. Amit Singh, AGM for TPDDL Mr. Niraj Kumar, Sr. Central Govt.
Adv. with Mr. Chaitanya Kumar, Adv. for R-3
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNA
O R D E R
% 19.12.2025 1.
The present writ petition has been filed seeking directions to the respondents to install the new electricity meter and restore the electricity supply at Flat No. 284, First Floor, Kohat Enclave, Pitampura North-West, Delhi-110034.
2.
Pursuant to the directions of this Court, inspection has been carried out by respondent no. 3, i.e., Station House Officer ("SHO"), Police Station Subhash Place, and a Status Report dated 09th July, 2025 has been filed, as per which, the possession of the premises was with the owner of the The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 22/12/2025 at 13:02:31
property, i.e., respondent no. 4 herein. Further, the petitioner herein was a tenant in the said premises.
3.
Today, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the goods of the petitioner have been removed from the premises and that certain goods of the petitioner have also been stolen, and thus, the respondent no. 4 has taken law in her own hands. 4.
Learned counsel appearing for respondent no. 3, i.e., SHO, Police Station-Subhash Place, confirms the fact that the possession of the premises was with respondent no. 4, i.e., the owner of the premises. 5.
As stated in the Status Report, certain goods of the petitioner were also lying in the premises.
6.
Clearly, the petitioner is no longer in possession of the premises in question. Therefore, the prayer, as claimed in the present writ petition, has become infructuous.
7.
Needless to state, the petitioner is at liberty to seek his remedies in accordance with law.
8.
Accordingly, noting the aforesaid, the present writ petition is disposed of.
MINI PUSHKARNA, J DECEMBER 19, 2025/KR The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 22/12/2025 at 13:02:31