High Court of DelhiCS(COMM)/291/2018

Louis Vuitton Malletier v. Omi

2018-07-24Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Manmohan2 pages

F-61 $~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(COMM) 291/2018 & I.As. 13709/2013, 14021/2017 AND 14103/2017 LOUIS VUITTON MALLETIER ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Dhruv Anand, Advocate with Ms. Udita Patro and Mr. Shamim Nooreyezdan, Advocates.

versus MR. OMI & ANR.

..... Defendants Through: Mr. Sarthak Katyal, Advocate for Mr. Jagjit Singh Sahu, Advocate for defendant No.1.

Mr. Nitin Mehta, Advocate for defendant No.2.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN

O R D E R

% 24.07.2018 Present suit has been filed for permanent injunction restraining infringement of trademarks, copyright, passing off, dilution and garnishment, damages, delivery up etc.

Today, Mr. Sarthak Katyal and Mr. Nitin Mehta, learned counsel for defendant No.1 and defendant No.2 state that they have no objection if the present suit is decreed in accordance with para 42 (a), (b), (c) and (d) of the plaint.

Learned counsel for defendant No.2 also states that the defendant No.2 shall pay costs of Rs.50,000/-.

In view of the aforesaid statement, learned counsel for plaintiff does not wish to press for any other or further reliefs. The statements made by learned counsel for parties are accepted by this Court and parties are held bound by the same. Accordingly, present suit is decreed in accordance with para 42(a), (b), (c) and (d) of the plaint along with costs of Rs. 50,000/- as well as the statements made by the learned counsel for parties. Registry is directed to prepare a decree sheet accordingly.

Registry is also directed to issue to an authorised representative of the plaintiff a certificate authorizing it to receive back from the Collector half amount of the Court fee paid by it in the present suit. With the aforesaid observations, present suit and all pending applications stand disposed of.

It is clarified that the disposal of the suit shall not prejudice either of the parties in the disposal of the Contempt petition being CCP(O) 10/2018 in which the judgment has already been reserved. MANMOHAN, J JULY 24, 2018 js