Vinod Kumar Sharma v. Yogesh Thakur

$~17 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.L.P. 194/2021 VINOD KUMAR SHARMA .....Petitioner Through:

Mr. Arjun Harkauli and Mr. Abeer Shandilya, Advocates.

versus YOGESH THAKUR .....Respondent Through:

Mr. Sundeep Sehgal, Advocate.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA

O R D E R

% 08.04.2025 CRL.L.P. 194/2021 1.

Leave to Appeal under Section 378(4) read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as 'Cr.P.C.') has been filed on behalf of the Leave Petitioner, Vinod Kumar Sharma to challenge the Order dated 06.09.2021 in CRL.A. No. 606/2019, passed by the learned ASJ, Saket Court, New Delhi.

2.

Considering the grounds sought for seeking Leave to Appeal, the Leave Petition is allowed. Leave granted and Appeal be registered. Crl.A............./2025 (to be numbered) 3.

Submissions heard from both the parties.

4.

The record shows that the Trial Court Record has not been summoned.

5.

E-Trial Court Record of the learned Metropolitan Magistrate, as well as, the learned ASJ, be summoned on or before the next date of hearing i.e. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/04/2025 at 15:42:46

05.05.2025.

6.

Be listed for arguments on 05.05.2025.

NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J APRIL 8, 2025/RS The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/04/2025 at 15:42:46