M/S J.N. Gupta And Co. v. Mangla Hoists Pvt. Ltd.

$~DB-6 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + FAO (COMM) 166/2025 & CM APPL. 37099-37100/2025 M/S J.N. GUPTA AND CO.

.....Appellant Through:

Mr. Anil Kr. Singh, Mr. Pavitra Veer Singh and Mr. Shinu Gupta, Advocates versus MANGLA HOISTS PVT. LTD.

.....Respondent Through:

Mr. Arun Kumar, Advocate (Through VC)

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RENU BHATNAGAR

O R D E R

% 30.06.2025 1.

After hearing arguments for some time, learned counsel for appellant submits that in terms of Order XLIII Rule 1 CPC, the present appeal is not maintainable and, therefore, he does not press the present appeal. He, however, submits that he may be given liberty to challenge order dated 04.06.2025 by filing a petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. 2.

Learned counsel for respondent also appears on advance notice through videoconferencing.

3.

Be that as it may, in view of aforesaid statement made by learned counsel for appellant, present appeal is dismissed as not pressed. 4.

The liberty is always available to the appellant to file any petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India as it may be advised. MANOJ JAIN, J (VACATION JUDGE) RENU BHATNAGAR, J (VACATION JUDGE) JUNE 30, 2025/dr/shs The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 23:54:47