Sushil Srivastava & ORS v. Krishan Avtar

$~22 & 23 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CM(M) 1410/2019, CM APPL. 42685/2019 & CM APPL. 42687/2019 SUSHIL SRIVASTAVA & ORS ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr. Tarun Agarwal and Mr. Ankush Shrivastava, Advocates.

(M:9811485063) with Petitioner No.6 in person.

versus KRISHAN AVTAR ..... Respondent Through:

None.

WITH + CM(M) 1527/2019 & CM APPL. 46500/2019 SUSHIL SRIVASTAVA & ORS ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr. Tarun Agarwal and Mr. Ankush Shrivastava, Advocates.

With Petitioner No.6 in person.

versus KRISHAN AVTAR ..... Respondent Through:

None.

CORAM:

JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH

O R D E R

% 17.02.2020 It is informed that vide order dated 7th November, 2019, the leave to defend application has been dismissed and the petition under Section 14 (1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act has been allowed. Accordingly, these petitions are infructuous. The remedies of the Petitioners against the said order dated 7th November, 2019 are left open. The Petitioners are permitted to raise all objections available to them in accordance with law, including the objections raised in the present petition. PRATHIBA M. SINGH, J.

FEBRUARY 17, 2020/dj