Mohita Bhargava & ANR v. Sukesh Bhargava

$~22 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ CRL.M.C. 644/2016 & Crl.M.A. Nos.2664-2665/2016 MOHITA BHARGAVA & ANR ..... Petitioners Through Mr.N.S. Vasisht, Adv.

versus SUKESH BHARGAVA ..... Respondent Through

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI

O R D E R

% 29.02.2016 Crl.M.A. Nos.2665/2016 Allowed, subject to just exceptions.

CRL.M.C. 644/2016 & Crl.M.A. No.2664/2016 The grievance of the petitioners in the present case is that the petitioners have not been granted any interim maintenance. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the purpose of the petitioners would be satisfied if the Trial Court is directed to expedite the proceedings. It is ordered accordingly. The petition and application are disposed of accordingly. P.S.TEJI, J FEBRUARY 29, 2016 aa