Mohtasim Nazmi & ANR v. State & ORS.

$~45 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(CRL) 2715/2019 MOHTASIM NAZMI & ANR ..... Petitioners Through:

None.

versus STATE & ORS.

..... Respondents Through:

Mr Amit Peswani, Advocate for Ms Nandita Rao, ASC for State.

SI Rohit Kumar, PS Wazirabad.

Mr M.N. Siddiqi, Mr Vishal Raj Sehijpal and Mr Purushendra Bhardwaj, Advocates for R-4 & 6.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU

O R D E R

% 27.02.2020 1.

None appears for the petitioners.

2.

The petitioners have filed the present petition, inter alia, seeking directions that they be afforded security and protection. The petitioners had married contrary to the wishes of the family members of petitioner no.1 and fear that they would be harmed by them.

3.

It is claimed that respondent nos. 4 to 6, who are the parents and brother of petitioner no.1, have issued threats against the petitioners. 4.

The learned counsel appearing for respondent nos. 4 to 6 states that the said respondents have no grievance against the petitioners and petitioners need not have any fear of them.

5.

Respondent no. 6 (brother of petitioner no.1) is present in Court and

states that he has no grievance against the petitioners and would not interfere in their lives in any manner. He is bound down to the said statement. 6.

By an order dated 23.09.2019, this Court had directed the SHO, PS Wazirabad and SHO, PS Roop Nagar to ensure that the petitioners are protected. They were further directed to provide the mobile number of the SHO/beat constable of the area so that they could contact the police in case of any eventuality. The said order is made absolute. 7.

No further orders are required to be passed in this petition. The same is disposed of.

VIBHU BAKHRU, J FEBRUARY 27, 2020 RK