Vineet Bansal Alias Vinit Bansal And ANR v. The State (Govt. Of NCT Of Delhi) And ORS
$~3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 7097/2023 & CRL.M.A. 26480/2023 VINEET BANSAL ALIAS VINIT BANSAL AND ANR ..... Petitioners Through:
Ms.
Sakshi Sachdeva and Ms.
Aayuchi Gupta, Advocates with petitioners in person.
versus THE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) AND ORS ..... Respondents Through:
Mr. Laksh Khanna, APP for State with SI Sumit PS Subhash Palace Mr. Pradeep Ahlawat, Advocate for respondent Nos. 2 and 3 along with respondents through VC.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI
O R D E R
% 12.01.2024 1.
The present proceedings are instituted under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of FIR No. 40/2016 registered under Sections 308/323/34 IPC at Police Station Subhash Palace, New Delhi on the ground that the parties have amicably settled their disputes. 2.
As per the allegations levelled in the FIR, on 10.01.2016, at around 8 PM, when respondent Nos. 2 and 3 were travelling back, their car was hit by another car, wherein a scuffle took place and the petitioners abused and beat the said respondents.
3.
Mr. Laksh Khanna, learned APP for the State, on instructions, submits that the petitioners are the only accused person and respondent Nos. 2 and 3 are the only victims in the present case. He further submits that in the The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.
present case, charge sheet has already been filed. 4.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the parties have amicably settled their disputes before Delhi Mediation Centre, Rohini District Courts, Delhi on 01.10.2019. In terms of the said settlement, respondent Nos.2 and 3 are now left with no claim or grievance against the petitioners.
5.
The petitioners (who are present in Court) as well as respondent Nos.2 and 3 (who have joined the proceedings through VC), have been identified by their counsel as well as the Investigating Officer/ SI Sumit PS Subhash Palace, New Delhi.
6.
The petitioners have shown remorse for their conduct and they undertake not to repeat the said act in future. Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 also state that they have entered into the aforementioned settlement agreement out of their own free will, volition and without any coercion. They further state that they have no objection if the present FIR and consequent proceedings are quashed.
7.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that no other proceedings are pending between the parties.
8.
The parties shall remain bound by the statements made in Court today.
9.
In view of the above facts and since no useful purpose will be served in continuance of the proceedings, it is directed that the aforesaid FIR and the consequent proceedings arising therefrom are hereby quashed, subject to payment of cost of Rs.2,500/- by each of the petitioner to be deposited with Delhi State Legal Services Authority within two weeks from today. The amount so deposited shall be utilized by the Delhi State Legal Services The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.
Authority for providing counselling/psychological support to POSCO victims requiring such assistance.
10.
Proof evidencing receipt of deposit shall be filed with the Investigating Officer as well as in Court.
11.
Let a copy of this order be sent to Member Secretary, Delhi State Legal Services Authority for information.
12.
With the above directions, the petition is disposed of. MANOJ KUMAR OHRI, J JANUARY 12, 2024/rd The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.