Piyush Chaturvedi v. Mrs. Bimal Sehgal

$~61 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CM(M) 2868/2024 & CM APPL. 37735-37737/2024 PIYUSH CHATURVEDI .....Petitioner Through:

Mr. Aditya Raghav Bundela & Mr.

Bikram Singh Patel, Advocates versus MRS. BIMAL SEHGAL .....Respondent Through:

None

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN

O R D E R

% 09.07.2024 CM APPL. 37736/2024 Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions. CM(M) 2868/2024 & CM APPL. 37735 & 37737/2024 1.

Present petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India and the petitioner has challenged impugned order dated 28.05.2024. 2.

Petitioner happens to be judgment-debtor and his sole grievance is to the effect that without hearing him, the learned Trial Court has directed the attachment of his savings bank account for the purpose of satisfaction of the decree in question.

3.

Mr. Aditya Raghav Bundela, learned counsel for the petitioner has, at the very outset, stated that matter has been amicably settled between the parties and, therefore, petitioner is no longer desirous of continuing with the present petition. He, therefore, prays that petition may be dismissed as withdrawn.

4.

Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs. MANOJ JAIN, J JULY 9, 2024/dr The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 03:47:08