Mujahid Ali v. Pritpal Singh (Now Deceased) Thr Lrs

$~27 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RFA 416/2024 MUJAHID ALI .....Appellant Through:

None.

versus PRITPAL SINGH (NOW DECEASED) THR LRS .....Respondent Through:

Mr. Sarabjeet Singh, Advocate.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA

O R D E R

% 05.11.2024 [Physical Hearing/Hybrid Hearing (as per request)] CM APPL. 38241/2024 (for condonation of delay of 170 days in filing) CM APPL. 38240/2024 (stay) and RFA 416/2024 1.

The appellant has assailed judgment and decree of recovery of possession of the tenanted premises, passed under Order XII Rule 6 CPC. The delay of 170 days in filing the appeal is explained on the ground that the appellant is a businessman and mostly out of station and that the review application was dismissed and that his wife got seriously ill. No specific dates or details have been divulged in the application. 2.

Since none appears for appellant, the appeal is dismissed in default. GIRISH KATHPALIA, J NOVEMBER 5, 2024/ry Click here to check corrigendum, if any The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/11/2024 at 12:06:22