Vijender v. Mcd & ORS.

$~10 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(C) 9027/2025 with CM APPL. 38431/2025 VIJENDER .....Petitioner Through:

Mr. Inderpreet Singh, Advocate (through VC).

versus MCD & ORS.

.....Respondents Through:

Mr. Mukesh Gupta, standing counsel for MCD with Mr. Vanaj Vidyan, Ms.

Sneha Roy and Ms. Gurleen Kaur, Advocates for R-1/MCD.

Mr. Lall Taksh Joshi and Ms. Minu Kumari, Advocates for GNCTD.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSAL

O R D E R

% 25.02.2026 1.

Counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the present writ petition in view of the fact that respondent no.1/MCD is proceeding to take action against the unauthorised and illegal construction which is the subject matter of the writ petition.

2.

Needless to state, MCD shall proceed with the action in an expeditious manner.

3.

Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. 4.

Consequently, all pending application stand disposed of. AMIT BANSAL, J FEBRUARY 25, 2026/Rzu The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 27/02/2026 at 13:27:36