Mohit Chaudhary v. State

$~28 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 445/2017 MOHIT CHAUDHARY ..... Petitioner Represented by:

Mr. Vijay Kumar Aggarwal, Mr. Neeraj Kumar Jha, Advs.

versus STATE ..... Respondent Represented by:

Ms. Rajni Gupta, APP with SI Inderjeet DIU/South.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA

O R D E R

% 03.02.2017 Crl.M.A. 1987/2017 Exemption allowed subject to just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 445/2017 After some arguments learned counsel for the petitioner states that he does not press the present petition but only seeks extension of time in depositing the amount of ₹20 lakhs as directed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge in Para 8 of the order dated 16th January, 2017. Notice. Learned APP for the State accepts notice. The petitioner was directed to deposit a sum of ₹20 lakhs with the Reader of the learned Trial Court within three weeks. The said amount be now deposited within a period of further two weeks. CRL.M.C. 445/2017

Rest of the conditions imposed in the order dated 16th January, 2017 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge granting anticipatory bail to the petitioner would remain same.

Application is dismissed as withdrawn. Order dasti. MUKTA GUPTA, J.

FEBRUARY 03, 2017 'ga'

CRL.M.C. 445/2017