Vijay Kumar v. State

$~41 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 332/2018 and Crl.M.A. 2615/2018 VIJAY KUMAR ..... Petitioner Through: Mr.Sarvesh Singh, Advocate versus STATE ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Ashish Dutta, APP for State

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA

O R D E R

% 16.02.2018 The status report be submitted on behalf of the State. The State has also put forth cheques in question i.e., one stated to be the original cheque and one allegedly forged cheque bearing No.355973 dated 28.03.2017 and also submits that the original cheque dated 24.03.2017 is for a sum of Rs.2452/- and that the allegedly forged cheque No.355973 being dated 28.3.2017 is for a sum of Rs.29,37000/-, whereas the cheque which is an original cheque is indicated to be issued in the name of Idea Cellular Limited, Account No.100001164541, the forged cheque in the name of yourself for RTGS is issued allegedly by Nera Telecommunications (India) Pvt. Ltd. and the applicant is indicated to have been found present as per the CCTV footage to having presented the stated forged cheque at the Axis Bank at the Lajpat Nagar Branch, New Delhi. On behalf of the State it is submitted that the custodial investigation and interrogation of the applicant is required in relation

to the gold allegedly purchased through the cheque amount and the specimen signatures of the applicant are also required. It has also been submitted on behalf of the State that there are several other persons that would be involved in the commission of the alleged crime. In the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case and on the perusal of the cheques that have been put forth on behalf of the State, there is no ground for anticipatory bail, the bail application is thus rejected.

Nothing stated herein however, shall have any effect on the merits of the case.

A copy of the order be given Dasti, as prayed. ANU MALHOTRA, J FEBRUARY 16, 2018/sv