Raj Kumar v. Shaheed Udham Singh Smarak Co. Education Secondary School And ORS

t\A $~2&4 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(C) 1706/2013 RAJ KUMAR Petitioner Through;

Mr. AshokAgarwaland Ms. NishaTomar, Advs.

versus SHAHEED UDHAM SINGH SMARAK CO. EDUCATIONSECONDARYSCHOOL AND ORS Respondents Through:

Mr. B.B.Guptaand Mr. SomyamKhetarpal, Adv. for R1 & 2.

+ W.P.(C) 1865/2013 VINITAGAUR ••••• Petitioner Through;

Mr. AshokAgarwaland Ms. NishaTomar, Advs.

versus DIRECTOROF EDUCATIONANDANR Respondents Through;

Ms. ZubedaBegum,standingcounselof GNCTDforDOE.

Mr. B.B.Guptaand Mr. SomyamKhetarpal, Adv. for R-2.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKIJ. MEHTA

ORDER

o/„ 04.03.2015 1.

After arguments, these petitions are disposed of with the r'

consentorderthat in W.P.(C)No. 1706/2013the petitionerSh. Raj Kumar will be paid 100% salary by the respondentno.1-schoolfor the period for whichpetitionerSh. Raj Kumarhas workedfrom 17.1.2012to 1.11.2014 W.P.(C)1706/2013&1865/13 P^Se1of2 By:AMULYA

and in W.P.(C)No. 1865/2013the petitionerSmt.VinitaGaur will similarly get the payment for the period from 16.1.2012 to 11.11.2014. These payments be made to the petitionerswithin a period of four weeks from today. It is specificallyagreedthat these petitionerswill not be entitledto any interestfor delayedpaymentand for costs.

2.

I may clarify that the aforesaiddates are given to me by the counsel for the petitioners.

3.

The writ petitionsare accordinglyallowedand disposedofin terms of the aforesaid order.

VALMIKIJ. MMTA, MARCH 04,2015 ib W.P.(C)1706/2013&1865/13