Prabakaran v. The State Of (NCT Of Delhi)

$~69 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 2385/2025 PRABAKARAN .....Petitioner Through:

Mr. Samaksh Sharma, Advocate.

versus THE STATE OF (NCT OF DELHI) .....Respondent Through:

Mr. Ajay Vikram Singh, APP.

SI Ravi Beniwal, P.S. Lajpat Nagar.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA

O R D E R

% 26.08.2025 1.

Mr. Samaksh Sharma, counsel for Petitioner, states that since the Petitioner has already been enlarged on bail by the Sessions Court, he has instructions to withdraw the present application. 2.

Noticing that the bail has been granted by the Sessions Court during the pendency of the instant bail application, the Court has queried whether such a fact has to be brought to the notice of the Sessions Court by the Petitioner. In response, Mr. Sharma states that the application for bail was moved by the Petitioner through another counsel and he did not represent the Petitioner before the Sessions Court.

3.

Mr. Ajay Vikram Singh, APP for State, submits that this fact could not be brought to the notice of the Sessions Court by the State. 4.

Since the State itself has not brought this fact to the notice of the Sessions Court, perhaps the error has occurred. The State is directed to be The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 28/08/2025 at 11:57:57

remained vigilant so that this lapse does not occur in the future. 5.

With the above directions and also considering the overall facts and circumstances of the case, the present application is dismissed as withdrawn. SANJEEV NARULA, J AUGUST 26, 2025 as The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 28/08/2025 at 11:57:57