Parul Singh Through Her Mother Babita Kumari v. Directorate Of Education & ORS.

$~71 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(C) 13227/2023 PARUL SINGH THROUGH HER MOTHER BABITA KUMARI ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr. Arkaneil Bhaumik, Mr.

Rayadurgam Bharat, Mr. Adhishwar Suri, Mr. Shashwat Kabi, Ms. Suparna Jain for Dr. Amit George, Advocate versus DIRECTORATE OF EDUCATION & ORS.

.... Respondents Through:

Mr. Utkarsh Singh for Mr.

Santosh Kumar Tripathi, Standing Counsel for DoE Mr. Pramod Gupta, Ms. Nicole Gomez, Ms.

Adyanshi Kashyap and Ms. Saloni Narayan, Advocates for R-2.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR J U D G M E N T (ORAL) % 22.04.2024 W.P.(C) 13227/2023 1.

The Court appreciates the fact that the Indian School (Morning Shift) in this case has adopted a proactive approach and has granted admission to the petitioner in deference to the request made by the petitioner. Mr. Gupta, learned Counsel for the respondent-school also submits that the school is willing to treat the petitioner as a regular student in the EWS category and impart education in terms of the RTE Act.

KUMAR 16:06:23 By:CHANDRASHEKHARAN HARI SHANKAR 16:05:27 W.P.(C) 13227/2023

2.

As such, the grievance of the petitioner does not survive for consideration.

3.

The petition stands disposed of.

C.HARI SHANKAR, J APRIL 22, 2024 rb Click here to check corrigendum, if any KUMAR 16:06:23 By:CHANDRASHEKHARAN HARI SHANKAR 16:05:27 W.P.(C) 13227/2023