Amet Sikka v. UOI And ANR

$~17 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(C) 1392/2016 AMET SIKKA ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr.P.R. Sikka, Adv.

versus UOI AND ANR ..... Respondent Through:

Mrs.Bharathi Raju, CGSC for R1/UOI;

Mr.Pankaj Chopra with Mr.Y.R. Sharma, Advs. for R-2.

CORAM:

HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH

O R D E R

% 22.02.2016 Mr.Pankaj Chopra, the learned counsel who accepted notice for the respondent No.2/Election Commission of India states that the Election Commission of India will consider the objections raised by the petitioner vide his representation dated 26.11.2015 and an appropriate decision would be taken in accordance with law.

Recording the above statement, the writ petition is disposed of. CHIEF JUSTICE JAYANT NATH, J FEBRUARY 22, 2016/pmc