← Library
High Court of DelhiCS(COMM)/756/2022

Verizon Trademark Services Llc & ORS. v. Selvaganapathy Swaminathan & ANR.

2024-03-04Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Anish Dayal5 pages

$~10 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(COMM) 756/2022 & I.A. 17801/2022 VERIZON TRADEMARK SERVICES LLC & ORS.

.... Plaintiffs Through:

Mr. Pravin Anand, Ms. Vaishali R.

Mittal and Mr. Shivang Sharma, Advocates.

versus SELVAGANAPATHY SWAMINATHAN & ANR. ..... Defendants Through:

None

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANISH DAYAL

O R D E R

% 04.03.2024 1.

It is noted by the order of 02nd February, 2024 of the Joint Registrar that defence of defendant no.1 has already been struck off vide order dated 11th August, 2022 since neither written statement was filed nor had they entered appearance.

2.

Defendant no.2 was a Domain Name Registrar who had registered the infringing domain name. Written statement was filed by defendant no.2 on 09th December, 2022. It is stated that they have complied with order of this Court dated 02nd November, 2022 and suspended the domain name on 27th June, 2022 and later blocked it on 30th October, 2022. 3.

In view of the same, counsel for plaintiffs seeks a decree in their favour under Order VIII Rule 10, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 ('CPC'). 4.

The suit had been filed alleging infringement of plaintiffs' well-known trademarks:

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

and other marks, containing, or comprising of, the trademark 'VERIZON' by defendant no.1 on account of use of a nearly identical trademark 'VERYZON', for manufacturing lifts viz. heavy duty goods lift, industrial goods lift, structure goods lift, outdoor structure goods lift, vehicle goods lift, etc. and providing ancillary services.

5.

Plaintiff no.1 is a part of the Verizon group of companies and has granted an exclusive license to plaintiff no.2 for use of the trademark 'VERIZON' and the 'VERIZON' logos in all its respects. Plaintiff no.2 further granted a sub-license to plaintiff no.3. 6.

Counsel for plaintiff has pointed out to the order dated 11th July, 2023 passed by this Court in CS (COMM) 220/2023 titled Verizon Trademark Services LLC & Ors. V. Vikash Kumar, 2023:DHC:4911 wherein, pursuant to scrutiny of documents presented by plaintiffs, the Court declared the trademark 'VERIZON' a well-known trademark within the meaning of Section 2(1)(zg) read with Section 11(6) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999. 7.

Grievance of plaintiff related to use of the mark 'VERYZON' by The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

defendants for their domain name and trading name. 8.

This Court on 02nd November, 2022 passed an ex-parte ad interim injunction in favour of plaintiff, noting details of plaintiffs' registered trademarks as well as their pleadings in relation to their vast goodwill and reputation as well as knowledge of defendants' infringing trademarks. It is also noted that the cease and desist notice dated 24th June, 2022 was issued by plaintiffs and defendant no.2 had suspended the domain name subsequently.

9.

An e-mail dated 08th December, 2022 was received from defendant no.1 by the plaintiffs, which is reproduced in order dated 23rd January, 2023 passed by this Court. Accordingly, interim order dated 02nd November, 2022 was confirmed qua defendant no.1.

10.

Accordingly, in view of these facts and circumstances, plaintiffs are entitled to a decree in their favour. Accordingly, decree is passed in terms of prayer 75 (i), (ii) & (iii) of the plaint, extracted as below: The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

11.

Decree sheet be drawn accordingly.

12.

Counsel for the plaintiff prays for costs and damages. Taking into account these facts and circumstances, costs and nominal damages of Rs. 2,50,000/- (Rs. Two Lakhs Fifty Thousand only) are awarded in favour of the plaintiffs.

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

13.

Suit stands disposed of in view of the above. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of as infructuous.

14.

Order be uploaded on the website of this Court. ANISH DAYAL, J MARCH 4, 2024/ kct/sc The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.