Rahul Kumar v. Municipal Corporation Of Delhi

$~23 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(C) 15252/2022 RAHUL KUMAR ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr. Kamlesh Kumar Mishra, Mr. Aditya and Ms. Megha Gupta, Advocates

Versus

MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through:

Mr. Ajjay Aroraa, Advocate with Mr. Kapil Dutta, Mr. Vansh Lutha and Ms. Simran Arora, Advocates.

Mr. Kirti Uppal, Senior Advocate with Mr. Shekhar, Advocate

CORAM:

HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA

O R D E R

% 28.02.2024 1.

Status report filed by MCD is taken on record. 2.

Mr. Kirti Uppal, Senior Advocate appearing for the owner of premises states that the owner shall apply for regularisation under Appendix (Q) of the Building Bye -laws.

3.

Needless, to state, that if and when such an application is filed, the same shall be decided in accordance with law. This Court clarifies that it has not commented on the merits of the regularisation application. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/03/2024 at 11:28:19

4.

In view of the aforesaid statement, no further orders are called for in this writ petition. Accordingly, the present writ petition is closed. ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA, J FEBRUARY 28, 2024/hp The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/03/2024 at 11:28:19