Pernod Ricard India Private Limited v. Mohan Meakin Limited And ANR

$~5 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + C.O. (COMM.IPD-TM) 293/2021 PERNOD RICARD INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED .....Petitioner Through:

Mr. Waseem Shuaib Ahmed, Mr. Suryanshu Priyadarshi and Ms. Soumya Khandelwal, Advs.

versus MOHAN MEAKIN LIMITED AND ANR ..... Respondents Through Mr. Shivendra Pratap Singh and Mr. Navdeep Suhag, Advs. for Respondent 1 Mr. Alexander Mathai Paikaday, Adv. for the office of Trade Marks

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % 17.04.2023 1.

Mr. Navdeep Suhag, learned Counsel for Respondent 1, submits on instructions, that this dispute has become academic as the impugned mark of Respondent 1 has expired and Respondent 1 does not intend to renew the mark.

2.

Mr. Waseem Ahmed, learned Counsel for the petitioner, submits that, however, the mark continues to be reflected on the website of the Registrar of Trade Marks as registered. 3.

Mr. Paikaday, who appears on behalf of the Registrar of Trade Marks, undertakes that the position of the register would be rectified within a period of three weeks from today.

4.

As such, recording the aforesaid submissions, the dispute in question does not survive for consideration.

By:KAMLA RAWAT 18:14:57 C.O. (COMM.IPD-TM) 293/2021

5.

The petition is accordingly disposed of.

6.

Let the order be uploaded on the website of this Court within 24 hours.

C.HARI SHANKAR, J APRIL 17, 2023 rb By:KAMLA RAWAT 18:14:57 C.O. (COMM.IPD-TM) 293/2021