Vishal Divakar v. Shri Govind Mohan And ORS

$~54 to 58 & 77 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CONT.CAS(C) 982/2025 SURESH CHAND AND ORS .....Petitioners Through:

Mr. Ankur Chhibber, Adv.

versus SHRI GOVIND MOHAN AND ORS .....Respondents Through:

Mr. Sushil Raaja SPC for UOI + CONT.CAS(C) 984/2025 AMIT KUMAR AND ORS .....Petitioners Through:

Mr. Ankur Chhibber, Adv.

versus SHRI GOVIND MOHAN AND ORS .....Respondents Through:

AC Mr. Ankit Pandey, Insp Mr.

Sanjay & SI Mr. Amit + CONT.CAS(C) 985/2025 VISHAL DIVAKAR .....Petitioner Through:

Mr. Ankur Chhibber, Adv.

versus SHRI GOVIND MOHAN AND ORS .....Respondents Through:

Ms. Avshreya Pratap Singh Rudy, SPC with Ms. Usha Jamnal and Ms.

Harshita Chaturvedi, Advs. for Delhi Police AC Mr. Ankit Pandey, Insp Mr. Sanjay & SI Mr. Amit + W.P.(C) 16840/2022 & CM APPL. 39862/2025 RAJESH KUMAR AND ORS .....Petitioner Through:

Mr. Ankur Chhibber, Adv.

versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS .....Respondents Through:

Mr. Sushil Raaja, SPC for UOI Ms. Avshreya Pratap Singh Rudy, SPC with Ms. Usha Jamnal and Ms. Harshita Chaturvedi, Advs. for Delhi Police + W.P.(C) 17687/2022 & CM APPL. 39863/2025 DHARAMVIR AND ORS .....Petitioners Through:

Mr. Ankur Chhibber, Adv.

versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS .....Respondents Through:

Ms. Sarika Singh SPC with Mr.

Rahul Singh, Advs. for R-1 to 3 Ms. Avshreya Pratap Singh Rudy, SPC with Ms. Usha Jamnal and Ms. Harshita Chaturvedi, Advs. for Delhi Police + W.P.(C) 16853/2022 & CM APPL. 39876/2025 RAJENDRA KUMAR AND ORS .....Petitioners Through:

Mr. Ankur Chhibber, Adv.

versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS .....Respondents Through:

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY DIGPAUL ORDER (ORAL) % 09.07.2025 C. HARI SHANKAR, J.

CONT.CAS(C) 982/2025, CONT.CAS(C) 984/2025 and

CONT.CAS(C) 985/2025 and CM APPL. 39862/2025 in WP(C) 16840/2022, CM APPL. 39863/2025 in WP(C) 17687/2022 and CM APPL. 39876/2025 in WP(C) 16853/2022 1.

After some hearing, Mr. Ankur Chhibber, learned Counsel for the petitioners, on instructions, withdraws these contempt petitions as well as stay applications CM Appl. 39862/2025, CM Appl. 39863/2025 and CM Appl. 39876/2025 in WP(C) 16840/2022, WP(C) 17687/2022 and WP(C) 16853/2022 respectively. However, he prays that the petitioners may be granted some time to rejoin their parent cadres.

2.

On hearing Mr. Chhibber and Ms. Rudy, learned Counsel for the respondents, as a matter of indulgence, the petitioners are granted two weeks time to report to the repatriated parent cadres and three weeks time to vacate the premises in their occupation, if any. 3.

These contempt petitions as also CM Appl. 39862/2025, CM Appl. 39863/2025 and CM Appl. 39876/2025 in WP(C) 16840/2022, WP(C) 17687/2022 and WP(C) 16853/2022 are dismissed as withdrawn in the above terms.

C. HARI SHANKAR, J.

AJAY DIGPAUL, J.

JULY 9, 2025/dsn