← Library
High Court of DelhiW.P.(C)/9803/2024

Sayma v. National Education Society For Tribal Students

2025-03-28Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Prateek Jalan3 pages

$~2, 4, 5, 9 and 10 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(C) 9771/2024 and CM APPL.

40107/2024, CM APPL.2152/2025 KM SUNEETA RAJ AND ORS .....Petitioners versus NATIONAL EDUCATION SOCIETY FOR TRIBAL STUDENTS .....Respondent + W.P.(C) 10018/2024 and CM APPL. 40989/2024 PARMAR SAMRAGNIBEN BABULAL .....Petitioner versus NATIONAL EDUCATION SOCIETY FOR TRIBAL STUDENTS .....Respondent + W.P.(C) 10031/2024 and CM APPL. 41032/2024 VAGHMASHI URMILABEN BABUBHAI .....Petitioner versus NATIONAL EDUCATION SOCIETY FOR TRIBAL STUDENTS .....Respondent + W.P.(C) 9803/2024 and CM APPL. 40180/2024 SAYMA .....Petitioner versus NATIONAL EDUCATION SOCIETY FOR TRIBAL STUDENTS .....Respondent The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

+ W.P.(C) 9826/2024 and CM APPL. 40342/2024 DIVYA PANDEY AND ANR .....Petitioners versus NATIONAL EDUCATION SOCIETY FOR TRIBAL STUDENTS .....Respondent Appearance:

Mr. S.K. Rungta, Senior Advocate with Mr. Prashant Singh, Advocate for petitioners.

Ms. Archana Pathak Dave, ASG with Mr. Somesh Chandra Jha and Mr. Akash Kishore, Advocates for NESTS.

Ms. Archana Pathak Dave, ASG with Mr. Jagdish Chandra, CGSC for UOI with Mr. Shubham Kumar Mishra, Advocate with Ms. Garima Singh, LC.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN

O R D E R

% 28.03.2025 1.

Mr. S.K. Rungta, learned Senior Counsel for the petitioners, and Ms. Archana Pathak Dave, learned Additional Solicitor General, appearing for the respondent/National Education Society for Tribal Students ["NESTS"], state that the grievances of the petitioners in these five petitions have been resolved, inasmuch as NESTS has taken a decision to appoint them to the posts they had applied for.

2.

Mr. Rungta submits that the necessary appointment letters/posting orders be also issued expeditiously. Ms. Dave, assures the Court that this will be done as expeditiously as possible, subject to completion of all The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

formalities, and within the outer limit of three weeks. 3.

The respondents are also directed to bear in mind the manner in which these cases have been resolved, if any future advertisement is issued for the same post(s).

4.

The writ petitions, alongwith pending applications, are disposed of. PRATEEK JALAN, J MARCH 28, 2025 uk/kb/ The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.