← Library
High Court of DelhiCRL.M.C./5508/2024

Sandeep Verma & ANR. v. State NCT Of Delhi And ANR.

2024-08-02Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Anoop Kumar Mendiratta2 pages

$~30 & 31 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 5508/2024 SANDEEP VERMA & ANR.

.....Petitioners Through:

Mr. Vikas Gupta and Mr. Ieshaan Gupta, Advocates.

versus STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR.

.....Respondents Through:

Mr. Aman Usman, APP for the State with SI Nimmi, P.S.: Shahdara.

Mr. Nishant Shokeen, Mr. Rahul Singh, Ms. Sumita Singh and Mr.

Ankur Kashyap, Advocates for R-2.

+ CRL.M.C. 5532/2024 SANTOSH VERMA & ORS.

.....Petitioners Through:

Mr. Vikas Gupta and Mr. Ieshaan Gupta, Advocates.

versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR.

.....Respondents Through:

Mr. Aman Usman, APP for the State with SI Nimmi, P.S.: Shahdara.

Mr. Nishant Shokeen, Mr. Rahul Singh, Ms. Sumita Singh and Mr.

Ankur Kashyap, Advocates for R-2.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR MENDIRATTA

O R D E R

% 02.08.2024 CRL.M.A. 21023/2024 In CRL.M.C. 5508/2024 CRL.M.A. 21111/2024 In CRL.M.C. 5532/2024 Exemptions allowed, subject to just exceptions. Applications stand disposed of.

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/10/2024 at 11:47:20

CRL.M.C. 5508/2024 AND CRL.M.A. 21022/2024 CRL.M.C. 5532/2024 AND CRL.M.A. 21110/2024 1.

Petitions under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 ('BNSS') read with Article 227 of the Constitution of India have been preferred on behalf of the petitioners for quashing of FIR No. 267/2023 under Sections 498A/406/506/354/354A/34 IPC registered at P.S.: Shahdara and proceedings emanating therefrom.

2.

Learned APP for the State and learned counsel for respondent no. 2, appear on advance notice. Learned APP for State informs that chargesheet has since been filed and petitioners have appeared before Ld. JM after filing of chargesheet.

3.

At this stage, learned counsel for petitioners submits that since the present petitions have been preferred prior to filing of chargesheet, he may be permitted to withdraw the petitions with liberty to file the same afresh after making relevant references to evidence, if any, appearing, against the petitioners in the chargesheet.

4.

Taking the statement of learned counsel for petitioners on record, petitions are accordingly dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file afresh. A copy of this petition be kept in connected petition. ANOOP KUMAR MENDIRATTA, J AUGUST 2, 2024 p The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/10/2024 at 11:47:20