Tata Sons Ltd & ANR v. Aniket Singh

$~11.

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + EX.P. No.22/2016 & EA No.127/2016 (for appointment of LC). TATA SONS LTD & ANR ..... Decree Holders Through:

Mr. Achuthan Sreekumar and Mr.

Karan Kumar, Advs.

Versus

ANIKET SINGH ..... Judgement Debtor Through:

None.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW

O R D E R

% 14.09.2016 1.

Execution is sought of judgment dated 17th November, 2015 in CS(OS) No.681/2012 directing transfer of impugned websites in favour of the plaintiff no.2 and of recovery of Rs.5,00,000/- as punitive/exemplary damages and which amount the plaintiffs/decree holders have been directed to deposit with the Delhi High Court Library Fund. 2.

The counsel for the decree holders states that the decree in so far as for transfer of impugned website already stands satisfied and now the decree only for recovery of Rs.5,00,000/- from the judgment debtor is to be executed.

3.

Notice of the execution was issued and though is not reported to be served but the decree holders have filed an affidavit of service; even otherwise, considering that the decree is dated 17th November, 2015, there is no need for notice.

4.

The counsel for the decree holders on enquiry as to the mode in which execution is sought seeks transfer of the decree to the Court of the District EX.P. No.22/2016

Judge, Hooghli, West Bengal.

5.

Allowed.

6.

Decree sheet be prepared within one month of today and the decree is ordered to be transferred for execution to District Judge, Hooghli, West Bengal along with the certificate of non-satisfaction of decree and other accompanying documents.

7.

The counsel for the decree holders, on behalf of decree holders undertakes to, on recovery of the amount, deposit the same with Delhi High Court Library Fund.

8.

The execution petition is disposed of.

RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J.

SEPTEMBER 14, 2016 „pp‟..

EX.P. No.22/2016