Kamlesh v. M Radha

$~42 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ CRL.L.P. 508/2022 KAMLESH .....Petitioner Through:

Mr. N. Bisht and Ms.

Yatika Choudhary, Advocates.

versus M RADHA .....Respondent Through:

Mr. Rajeev Dahiya and Mr.

Rahul Lakhera, Advocates.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJAN

O R D E R

% 19.05.2025 CRL.M.A. 23268/2022 1.

The present application is filed by the petitioner/applicant seeking condonation of delay of 04 days in re-filing the present leave to appeal petition.

2.

For the reasons mentioned in the application, the delay stands condoned.

3.

The application stands disposed of.

CRL.L.P. 345/2022 4.

The present petition is filed seeking leave to appeal against the judgment dated 29.07.2022, passed by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate (MM)-04, Rouse Avenue Courts, New Delhi, pursuant to which the Respondent was acquitted for offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 ('NI Act').

5.

The matter requires consideration.

6.

In view of the above, the leave to appeal is granted and the The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 22/05/2025 at 12:12:05 appeal be numbered as Criminal Appeal ............/2025 (to be

numbered).

7.

The present petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms. Criminal Appeal ............/2025 (to be numbered) 8.

The appeal is Admitted.

9.

List in due course.

10.

Respondent shall furnish a personal bond in the sum of ₹10,000/- with one surety of the like amount, to the satisfaction of the Joint Registrar on 28.05.2025.

AMIT MAHAJAN, J MAY 19, 2025 DU The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 22/05/2025 at 12:12:05