← Library
High Court of DelhiCRL.L.P./525/2023

State v. Sameer

2024-08-01Hon'Ble Ms. Justice Prathiba M. Singh,Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Amit Sharma2 pages

$~11 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ CRL.L.P. 525/2023 & CRL.M.A. 28707/2023 STATE .....Petitioner Through:

Mr. Mukesh Kumar APP with SI Bijender, SI Kiran Sethi.

versus SAMEER .....Respondent Through:

CORAM:

JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH JUSTICE AMIT SHARMA

O R D E R

% 01.08.2024 1.

This hearing has been done through hybrid mode. 2.

This is a petition under Section 378(3) of the CrPC challenging the impugned judgment of acquittal dated 30th January, 2020, passed by ld. ASJ, by which, the Respondent has been acquitted for offences punishable under Sections 363/366 of the IPC as also Section 6 of POCSO Act, 2012, in SC No.

56883/2016 arising out of FIR No.

254/13, under Sections 363/366A/376/342 of the IPC and Sections 4/6 of the POCSO Act, registered at Patel Nagar.

3.

The impugned judgment of acquittal was passed on 30th January, 2020 and the leave petition is stated to have been filed sometime in August 2023. After removing objections, it was finally filed only on 6th October, 2023 and the first hearing in the matter was 19th October, 2023. 4.

A perusal of the application for condonation of delay shows that there was no justifiable cause which has been given for delay of more than The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/08/2024 at 10:45:36

1145 days. Even if the period during the Covid-19 pandemic i.e., from 15th March, 2020 till 28th February, 2022 is deducted, there is still a substantial period of delay.

5.

This Court has also perused the judgment and have seen the testimony of the prosecutrix which does not inspire confidence. There are several contradictions in the said testimony.

6.

In view of the facts and circumstances of this case, this Court is not inclined to condone the delay in filing of the present petition. 7.

In view of the above, the petition seeking leave to challenge the impugned judgment of acquittal is dismissed with all pending applications, if any.

PRATHIBA M. SINGH, J.

AMIT SHARMA, J.

AUGUST 01, 2024 MR/BH/NS The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/08/2024 at 10:45:36