Siddhi Bhargava v. State (Govt. Ofnct Of Delhi) And ANR.

$~59 to 61 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ CRL.REV.P. 1115/2023 SIDDHI BHARGAVA ..... Petitioner Through:

Adv. Nishant R. Goel & Adv. Gagan Talwar versus STATE (GOVT. OFNCT OF DELHI) AND ANR.

..... Respondents Through:

Mr. Hitesh Vali, APP for the State.

Mr. Gagan Chawla, Adv.

through V.C. for R-2.

+ CRL.REV.P. 1116/2023 SIDDHI BHARGAVA ..... Petitioner Through:

Adv. Nishant R. Goel & Adv. Gagan Talwar versus STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) AND ANR.

..... Respondents Through:

Mr. Hitesh Vali, APP for the State.

Mr. Gagan Chawla, Adv.

through V.C. for R-2.

+ CRL.REV.P. 1117/2023 SIDDHI BHARGAVA ..... Petitioner Through:

Adv. Nishant R. Goel & Adv. Gagan Talwar versus STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) AND ANR.

..... Respondents Through:

Mr. Hitesh Vali, APP for the State.

Mr. Gagan Chawla, Adv.

through V.C. for R-2.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJAN

O R D E R

% 11.01.2024 1.

The present petitions are filed under Section 397 read with The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/05/2024 at 12:52:44

Section 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) inter alia, praying that Respondent No. 2 be directed to supply complete and legible copy of the complaint along with its documents.

2.

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that an application under Section 204(3) of the CrPC was filed on behalf of the petitioner seeking copy of the complaint filed by the respondents, and all the supporting documents. He submits that the said application was not taken up by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate, and notice was framed against the petitioner. 3.

There is some controversy whether the application under Section 204(3) of the CrPC filed by the petitioner was listed before the learned Metropolitan Magistrate on 19.08.2023 since the order dated 19.08.2023 does not reflect that any such application was taken up.

4.

Mr. Gagan Chawla, learned counsel for Respondent No. 2 at the outset on instructions, submits that he has no objection if the documents as sought for are supplied. He submits that the same will be supplied by the within a period of one week from today.

5.

In view of the above, the learned counsel for the petitioner does not press any relief in the present petitions and seeks liberty to withdraw the same.

6.

The present petitions are dismissed as withdrawn, in the aforesaid terms.

7.

A copy of order be placed in all petitions.

AMIT MAHAJAN, J JANUARY 11, 2024 "SK"

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/05/2024 at 12:52:44