Ravinder Rana v. The State & ORS

67# $~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 485/2018 RAVINDER RANA ..... Petitioner Represented by:

Mr. N.S. Dalal, Advocate.

versus THE STATE & ORS ..... Respondents Represented by:

Mr. Piyush Singhal, Advocate for Mr. Ashish Aggarwal, Additional Standing Counsel for State.

Mr. Sanjeev Bhandari, Spl. P.P.

for CBI.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA

O R D E R

% 15.02.2018 1.

Issue notice.

2.

Learned proxy counsel for learned Additional Standing Counsel accepts notice on behalf of the State.

3.

Learned Spl. P.P. accepts notice on behalf of respondent No.2. 4.

The grievance of the petitioner in the present petition is that despite his having made applications to the Director General, Prisons for transferring him to semi open jail, as per the Standing Order No. 61 and the name of the petitioner having been put in the list containing proposed convicts to be proposedly transferred to semi open jail, no order has finally been passed.

W.P.(CRL) 485/2018

5.

Considering the averments in this petition, Director General, Prisons is directed to consider the present writ petition as a representation of the petitioner, take a decision thereon in accordance with law within a period of four weeks and intimate the outcome thereof to the petitioner. 6.

With theses directions, the petition is disposed of. MUKTA GUPTA, J.

FEBRUARY 15, 2018 'vn'

W.P.(CRL) 485/2018